Site not look beautiful? Click here

Reviews

Film review: ‘Crazy, Stupid, Love’

Image
Steve Carell and Julianne Moore star in ‘Crazy, Stupid, Love’.

The Details

Crazy, Stupid, Love
Three and a half stars
Steve, Carell, Ryan Gosling, Julianne Moore, Emma Stone
Directed by Glenn Ficarra and John Requa
Rated PG-13
Opens Friday
Beyond the Weekly
Official Movie Site
IMDb: Crazy, Stupid, Love
Rotten Tomatoes: Crazy, Stupid, Love

In the 10 years since he first commanded attention in The Believer, Ryan Gosling hasn’t exactly become renowned for his sense of humor, though he’s brought a wry touch to even roles as dark as the crack-addicted teacher in Half Nelson. So it’s a pleasant surprise to find him near the center of a mainstream Hollywood comedy like Crazy, Stupid, Love, in which he plays a sleek pick-up expert who helps a nebbish (Steve Carell) find his inner stud after the poor guy splits up with his cheating wife (Julianne Moore). Unfortunately, this lothario’s patented routine is no match for his latest conquest (Emma Stone), which means that everyone involved in this farcical roundelay has to reassess how much craziness and stupidity they’re prepared to embrace in the name of love.

Directed but not written by Glenn Ficarra and John Requa, the team responsible for the coal-black comedies Bad Santa (as writers) and I Love You Phillip Morris (as writer-directors), Crazy, Stupid, Love never even remotely approaches the toxic hilarity of their previous work—this is a risk-free crowd-pleaser that goes down smooth. But it’s still smarter and more nuanced than most studio fare, providing multiple opportunities for its talented cast to dig a bit deeper than their respective punchlines. Gosling and Stone, in particular, have fantastic chemistry as a couple whose self-consciousness about the head games they’re playing unexpectedly functions as an aphrodisiac. Watching a genuine smile crack through Gosling’s facade of charming indifference is a pleasure.

Share

Commenting Policy

Previous Discussion:

  • Here are 10 shows with some amount of promise, plus two old ones to keep watching.

  • Unlike its subject, who performed feats that people remembered their whole lives, the History Channel program is entirely forgettable.

  • Brosnan isn't James Bond, but the comparisons are unavoidable.

  • Get More Film Stories
Top of Story