Blog - Josh Bell Hates Everything
Small FontsDefault FontsLarge Fonts

Josh Bell Hates Everything

Weekly film critic Josh Bell is tough to please. Hear his take on the week's new releases in theaters and on DVD. Subscribe to the audio podcast via iTunes


September 5, 2008
Josh Bell hates children
August 21, 2008
Sexy deities and exploding heads
September 11, 2008
Burn after listening
August 8, 2008
Every pineapple has its spikes
August 14, 2008
It’s satire, stupid

Recent Posts

November 20, 2009
New Moon Lacks Bite
November 12, 2009
Destroying the world, one movie at a time
November 5, 2009
Christmas in November
November 4, 2009
This is it?
November 1, 2009
Fangoria Trinity of Terrors Day 3: All about zombies

Archives

February 22, 2009 · 11:36 PM

Winning the Oscar pool, but at what cost?

By Josh Bell

Sean Penn took home the Oscar for his uncanny portrayal of gay rights activist Harvey Milk in Milk, beating out another powerful contender and crowd favorite, Mickey Rourke, nominated for his astounding tour de force in The Wrestler.

Photo: oscar.com

Much to the consternation of the handful of other entrants, I won my Oscar pool, correctly predicting all but three of the eventual winners. But is this a good thing? Sure, I got a little bit of money, but I think I would have gladly traded it for a ceremony a little lighter on crushing predictability. When the biggest upset comes in the Best Foreign Film category, you know you've got a seriously dull ceremony. Sure, I was happy to see wins for Penelope Cruz and WALL-E, but even the people who really deserved their awards were obvious choices. And the Academy went with perennial favorite Sean Penn (who did a perfectly good job in Milk) over far more interesting choice Mickey Rourke, in the only mildly surprising choice among the major categories.

More

Related
Where are my shorts? (2/20/09)
The Academy Awards of predictability (2/20/09)
Local David Rockwell is secret weapon for Oscar’s new look (2/20/09)
Some real Oscar surprises (2/19/09)
Whatever, Oscar nominations (1/22/09)
Beyond the Weekly
81st Annual Academy Awards

The ceremony itself, too, was pretty dull, with needless montages of movies from 2008 that weren't nominated for awards, as if to argue that the Oscars aren't entirely out of touch. Hugh Jackman tried really hard as host, but he just couldn't hold anything together. And there were some really odd choices - Jackman and Beyonce do a lengthy musical number as a tribute to the alleged return of the musical, but the songs actually nominated for an award this year can't get more than a three-minute medley? Queen Latifah sings during the In Memoriam montage, and producers cut away from images of the dead people to show her strolling around the stage? Acting nominees get introduced with awkward tribute speeches rather than, I don't know, clips of them acting in movies? The dude from Twilight? Really?

2009 Oscar Nominees

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

Even Judd Apatow's tribute to ... something, starring James Franco and Seth Rogen as their Pineapple Express characters, couldn't perk things up. Other moments meant to be funny that weren't: Ben Stiller mocking Joaquin Phoenix and sort of disrespectfully distracting from the cinematography nominees; anything said by Jack Black; and Jackman's recession-themed props in the opening number. I think the only thing that made me laugh was Tina Fey and Steve Martin's dig at Scientology.

Okay, so at least it turned out to be relatively short despite early appearances, and the bejeweled set actually looked kind of cool. I appreciated the heartfelt speeches from Kate Winslet, Dustin Lance Black and Sean Penn, even if I didn't necessarily think they deserved to win. Plus, a film critic (Manny Farber) got acknowledged in the In Memoriam montage, so I suppose I really have nothing to complain about. Now how should I spend my winnings?

2 Comments So Far

(Removed by site staff)

Posted by: EricL on 2/23/09 at 5:33 p.m.

Corporate censorship is the process by which editors in corporate outlets intervene to halt publishing that portrays their business or business partners in a negative light. I believe that is just what happened here. If Josh Bell doesn't pre judge films before he see's them then he should defend himself against the accusation instead of censoring a consumers post. I am just passing along what I heard as I really don't care either way as I pick what movies I am going to see by word of mouth, but I do think the public should be aware of something like that if it is true. Of course this is America and you are innocent until proven Guilty as removing a post without any vulgarities in it seems almost like an admission of guilt, however this is the land where the banks just stole 700 billion dollars of taxpayer money so I guess a little corporate censorship should be the least of our concerns.

Posted by: EricL on 2/23/09 at 7:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Weekly editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.

Already Registered? Log In Below.
Username:
Password:  Forgotten your password?
 

SMS Alerts

Videos

Video Library

Flash is required

Cocktail of the Week

Cocktail of the Week Nov 19, 2009
by Xania Woodman

The Jaded Kiss

The bar is open! Or rather, back open. Adjacent to Dos Caminos at Palazzo, itty bitty Fusion Mixology Bar has gotten itself some fresh new beats and mixology talent as ...
Read more...