As We See It

  • Print
  • Small FontsDefault FontsLarge Fonts

Family fun—and guns

Scene from the new county gun park

Stacy J. Willis

Tue, Dec 29, 2009 (6:47 p.m.)

Image

Firing the first shots, Nevada state Sen. John Lee, left, and Clark County Commissioner Tom Collins officially open the new Clark County Shooting Park on December 19.

Photo: Kyle Hansen

Will they let us in without a gun? That’s my biggest concern as we drive to the new Clark County Shooting Park at the northern end of Decatur. I ask my cohort whether we can borrow her brother’s pistol; but shortly the talk turns to how her mother got shot in the foot once in a family gun-handling accident—“blood spurted straight up!” I decide we’ll go gunless.

Turns out yes, you’re welcome to go gunless. You can take a picnic. You can take a properly leashed dog. It’s a public park for the stouter-in-faith than I. There are RVs and sooner or later there’ll be camping. There’s a snack bar to be run by the Blind Industries of Nevada. “Safe, fun, affordable, family-oriented, world class, public recreational shooting facility” says the county’s informational material about the new 178-acre, $61 million range, the first such public park in Southern Nevada.

We pass the archery and shotgun ranges and pull in at the rifle-pistol combo range next to a sports car with Nevada plates reading “SNIPR.” The sky is crackling like Gettysburg circa 1863—pop-pop, pop-pop-pop—and I flinch and repeatedly deny my instinct to stop, drop and roll, or call 911. I think of soldiers in Iraq. Of Mel Gibson in Lethal Weapon. The reality-fiction lines are all crossed, per our era. As we take the parking lot, a family of four disembarks from a monster SUV with weaponry enough to subdue a hostile tribe; the little boy is a foot shorter than both of the rifles he carries and the whole family wears crisp cammies; one imagines their patriotism/attack-themed Christmas morning days earlier.

So we man-up and follow them on in, and by “in” I mean several steps up the sidewalk, where we find ourselves standing a few feet from more than 50 of our neighbors armed to the gills and firing away at paper targets set against a dirt berm. I don’t know why I expected someone to frisk us on the way in, or ask for ID or ask if we’d been drinking or were transporting fresh produce—days earlier I’d gotten a sterner park-ranger greeting on my way into the Rocky Mountain National Park scenic drive. But here we just walk up, fingers in our ears, stand next to a family eating Burger King on a picnic table behind the firing squad, and watch the Second Amendment in action.

I tell you this because if you haven’t seen it, it’s something to behold: a bunch of your fellow citizens triggering away for sport and trusting one another not to screw up. Shoulder-to-shoulder, with no bullet-proof glass in between anybody, a Sunday afternoon American exhortation. It’s a bit like the trust deal we make when we’re driving, with obvious exceptions such as the role of necessity in the activity. I’m barely finished absorbing the imminent danger all around me when the range master speaks from a stand with a microphone and calmly advises shooters to cease fire, take their ammo out and place the empty weapons on the tables in each of the 60 side-by-side shooting points. Then, he says, it’s okay retrieve the targets. And just like that, a dozen or so people—apparently totally confident in their complete-stranger neighbor’s ability to follow rules, disarm weapons, not fiddle or freak, etc.—do so. They walk across the dirt in front of several dozen pointing muzzles. They walk in front of the guy working a mullet, “Liberty Forever” T-shirt and checkered VANS standing by his Ruger. They walk in front of the woman fake-laugh-flirting over her .22, the nose-picking child behind the Winchester. I’m standing behind the shooters and muzzles, on edge, waiting. People get their targets and go back. There are no casualties, save my disbelief. “Do I got time to take this out there?” asks a gentleman about his fresh target late in the break. “Hurry,” says the range master.

It’s not that I think the guns will freakishly fire mystery bullets by themselves; it’s that instinctively, statistically, reasonably, there’s always a moron in a crowd. In fact, during this five- or 10-minute break, the range master thrice has to verbally censure shooters—one is handling his weapon, the other two are standing beyond the yellow line (nearer their weapons), against the rules. “Away from the table, please,” he says. But that’s the nature of people, isn’t it?

As is, I suppose, the decision to take what risks you must to make your stay bearable, while not encroaching upon, nor killing, your neighbors. Fragile balance, that. But sickly heartwarming.

We leave under a hail of gunfire through a crowd of smiling families. I drive 80 miles per hour in and out of traffic all the way home, prattling in disbelief about the open-air shooters.

The next day I call the park director, Don Turner, who assures me the park, though understaffed for the unexpected 2,000 or so visitors last weekend, is safer than your average street corner. “If it wasn’t safe we wouldn’t do it.” If something or someone goes wrong (I am reminded of a guy at the park who yelled at the driver of a massive red pick-up truck parked on the sidewalk: “They put sidewalks in for people to walk on, not for you to park your fucking truck on!”), county employees will handle it. And if they can’t, they’ll get help from the volunteer safety officers, or they’ll call Metro, he says. It’s surely safer than the illegal open-desert shooting that this park was meant to curtail.

What’s more, he explains, the park was designed with the input of shooting experts, and—less important to me when I hear gunfire—environmental experts: Some 5,000 plants here were re-harvested, water is double-filtered and much attention has been given to dust control. Plus—the good news goes on and on—the once-strident concern of neighbors has been somewhat assuaged by time and buffer zones.

So really, at $7 a day, tossing the kids in the car and heading to the public shooting park—which is only open on weekends “until the kinks are worked out” and a grand opening is held later this month—is a fine, multifaceted expression of freedom. Right? As is the right to be astonished by it.

Print This

Amazing. Great story.

Posted by: klampton on 12/30/09 at 3:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The author is a truly clueless idiot who thinly disguises her contempt for people who actually believe that the Constitution really means what it says; i.e. that PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms. She sounds truly surprised that no one there picked up and gun and just randomly started murdering children and old ladies.

Posted by: Tree_of_Liberty on 12/30/09 at 8:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

BTW, she says that there is always a moron in the crowd. It was her.

Posted by: Tree_of_Liberty on 12/30/09 at 8:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You ought to rename this site "Las Vegas Weakly".

Your "writer" will be all excited / more comfortable weaving 80 miles an hour thru traffic when taking her kids to the gaypride parade in San Francisco.

While she's there, she should pick up a sign for her front door that says "dear mr. criminal, this is an anti-second amendment, gun free home - I ridicule legal gun owners for a living, so please don't hurt / rape me too bad when you break in my home!"

Posted by: buggy on 12/31/09 at 1:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)

If this author had a brain she would be dangerous! Damn liberals.

Posted by: bob35614 on 12/31/09 at 5:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I am ashamed that this author is of the same gender as I am. I am see that testicles are in short supply these day. Damn coward.

Posted by: typicalwhiteperson on 12/31/09 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree with the author. Sure, we should be allowed to have guns if we want them, just as we should be allowed to have freeways for easy transportation, but do we really want our kids playing on a freeway? With gun ownership comes responsibility. A gun park with kids running around and very little staff members, does not sound safe to me.

Posted by: klampton on 12/31/09 at 10:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I have sent the author of this article a sincere offer to learn to shoot and expand her understanding of the shooting sports and firearms culture. No further comment on the quality of the article, except to point out that weaving in and out of traffic at 80mph is far more statistcally dangerous than a day at the firing range.

Posted by: gewehrmonkey on 12/31/09 at 1:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)

klampton, conservatives rely on THEMSELVES to monitor their children and keep them safe, not some government employee.

Posted by: Tree_of_Liberty on 12/31/09 at 2:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Good point,Tree of Liberty, but how many parents have put a pool in their backyards, believing that they'll just always keep an eye on their toddler, then get distracted and their toddler drowns? Happens all the time. If you don't put a gate around the pool, you raise the risk of an accidental drowning. The responsibility lies in putting the gate around the pool, not believing that you'll never be distracted.
I don't care what your political beliefs are. I care about children.

Posted by: klampton on 12/31/09 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yea, liberals always say It's "for the children" just before they steal more of your money or liberty. But guess what? Even without a government nanny per child at the gun park, not one child was shot!

Posted by: Tree_of_Liberty on 12/31/09 at 5:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I think Ms. Willis needs to get a grip on reality. People own guns. That is their RIGHT as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. People shoot guns at ranges. They have for decades. Gun owners are not the nutcases she seems to think we are. We DO abide by the rules, especially at a range. We ALL are responsible and aware of gun safety at all times while on the range. The "incidents" she noted are not the rule but the exception. People who are new to gun ownership and have not had any training have to be occasionally reminded of the safety rules. She didn't say if any of the "offenders" repeated their "offenses" though.

Posted by: JustOneMore on 1/1/10 at 3:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)

"What you talkin bout Willis?"

I think the new County Gun Park is a great example of Democracy in action. A fine group of citizens wanted a certain type of public recreational facility. ("Different strokes" for different folks - aka diversity) They volunteered much of their time to make this happen and worked government officials who understand their purpose is to facilitate the legal will of the people. I say thank you and well done.

Stacy J. Willis writes "I'm barely finished absorbing the imminent danger all around me when the range master speaks..."
Imminent danger? I do not think it means, what you think it means. Were people pointing their guns at you? Were bullets whizzing past you?

I take it that "As We See It" is an opinion section of LV Weekly and Stacy J. Willis gives us disdain and elitism with hints of Hunter S. Thompson. Has she ever been to a shooting range before? Has she ever shot a gun before? Is her opinion informed and well considered or is it assumptive and arrogant? Has the vegetarian been dispatched to review the steak house? Is she is yet another anti-gun journalist shooting from <cough> the hip? Inconceivable!

Inigo Montoya (no relation to Ron)

Posted by: InigoMontoya on 1/1/10 at 8:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Discussion:

In an effort to increase the dialogue on our stories, we will be requiring Facebook accounts to leave comments on lasvegasweekly.com stories. We believe that Weekly readers are likely to have Facebook accounts already and more apt to comment on this site with that account rather than have to create an account with us. If, however, you do not have a Facebook account, click here to sign up for one. If you have questions, comments or concerns about this new commenting policy, please let us know.

For any other questions related to commenting on Weekly stories, please read our full policy.

Facebook Activity