Features

  • Print
  • Small FontsDefault FontsLarge Fonts

[Essay]

What’s that in your genes?

Beauty and deception: Looking at hot women through the lens of evolutionary psychology

Rick Lax

Thu, Jan 29, 2009 (midnight)

Image

Every day I go to the bookstore and page through men’s magazines that promise me six-pack abs in 30 days and mind-blowing sex with supermodels. Sometimes I browse through books that teach me how to cure cancer with vitamins and milk, how to seduce the woman of my dreams with subliminal messages and prepackaged speeches, how to use the “Law of Attraction” to control the universe with my mind and how to use the positioning of the planets to find what we’re all after: true love.

I find these books in the nonfiction section.

As an attorney and former professional magician, I see deception wherever I look. I see it at the bookstores, on the Strip, inside the casinos and in bars and clubs. So when I asked my roommate Oxana what she looks for in a guy, it came as no surprise when she said, “somebody honest.” Oxana, a Russian showgirl who’s been living in Las Vegas for four years, told me that she’s dated liars and cheaters before, and what she really wants is “somebody who doesn’t play games—a no-bullshit guy.”

Basically Oxana wants somebody who hasn’t read Tony Clink’s book The Layguide: How to Seduce Women More Beautiful Than You Ever Dreamed Possible, No Matter What You Look Like or How Much You Make. In the book Clink recommends this strategy for picking up a girl in a bar: “Instead of approaching, have your wing move in on her. After a minute or two, have him call you over and introduce you. Say ‘hi,’ but look a little uncomfortable and leave soon after. ‘Poor guy,’ your wing says, ‘do not waste your time on him. Women hit on him all the time, but they’re only after his money. He just gets so tired of it. He’s kind of famous, too.’”

Oxana said that when she and her friends, most of whom are also showgirls, go out on the Strip, guys try this stuff on them all the time. Guys lie about their income, their possessions and their status. They wear knockoff designer watches and field phone calls from high-powered stockbrokers—the ones who apparently do business at midnight Mountain Standard Time.

“Why do guys do that stuff?” Oxana wanted to know.

“Because you’re attracted to guys who can provide for your potential offspring.”

“But I don’t want offspring.”

“Your genes do.”

If women are attracted to men who can provide for offspring, men are attracted to women who can produce them. In fact, to say that a woman is “beautiful” is to say that she looks fertile. Men are drawn to showgirls, promotional models, bottle girls and strippers because they look like they can bear 15 children. Without getting too bogged down in evolutionary psychology, men are attracted to fertile women because our male ancestors were; the genetic lines of the guys who were into the infertile women petered out a long time ago.

Just as men present themselves as richer and more powerful than they really are, women present themselves as younger, healthier and ultimately more fertile than they really are. They don’t carry around fabricated fertility clinic reports, but they do lie about their age. Sometimes they do it verbally, but most of the time they do it visually. They dye their hair blond, inflate their breasts and cinch their waists, all in an attempt to appear younger, healthier and more fertile than they really are.

Let’s start with hair. Like a lot of women who work on the Strip, Oxana dyes her hair blond. But why blond, as opposed to, say, black? Do gentlemen really prefer blondes? They do, and it’s because such hair occurs naturally at youth and grows out with age. With age a woman’s hair may turn from blond to red or blond to brunet or blond to gray, but never the other way around. So before hair dye came along, blond hair was a reputable indicator of youth. Crudely put, if a caveman slept with a blond chick, there was a good chance he’d knock her up.

The caveman’s chances were even better if the cavewoman’s blond hair was long and lustrous, too. An unhealthy woman’s body sends its nutrients away from the hair and to the more crucial body parts. As a result, the woman’s hair grows thin and dull. Today women simulate long, luscious hair with wigs and hair extensions.

Along with blond hair, high, firm breasts once served as a reputable indicator of youth and fertility, as breasts descend with age. Today women fight the sag with push-up bras, push-up swimsuits, corsets and, of course, cosmetic surgery. Every year plastic surgeons lift and augment 400,000 women’s breasts. And given how much money women spend on this procedure and how much attention tabloids, women’s magazines and TV news programs give the once-controversial surgery, you might guess that breasts are the most important fertility cue. But that distinction goes to the hip/waist ratio.

A woman whose waist is seven-tenths the size of her hips has hit the fertility cue jackpot. For starters, a woman with an hourglass figure is definitely not already pregnant. Pregnancy is nature’s ultimate mood-killer. In addition, a woman with an hourglass figure probably doesn’t have diabetes, hypertension or gallbladder disorder. And it’s unlikely that she’ll suffer a heart attack or stroke in the near future.

Perhaps nobody appreciates the importance of an hourglass figure better than Sara Blakley, creator of the popular body-shaping undergarment Spanx. Blakley’s clients include Julia Roberts, Tyra Banks and Oprah Winfrey, and her business is worth $150 million.

According to Blakley, Spanx “comfortably shapes problem areas, accentuates your waistline, minimizes your tummy and thighs, lifts your rear and makes inches seem to disappear.” Simply said, wearing Spanx makes your hip/waist ratio look greater than it really is; wearing Spanx makes you look like you can bear more children than you really can.

Using Spanx, silicone, hair extensions and dye, women can now fake all of the once-reputable indicators of fertility. And here’s the irony: even though guys understand this much, it doesn’t make us any less attracted to women with blond hair, large breasts and a large hip/waist ratio.

Why is that? Is it because the media bombards us with highly sexualized images of skinny blondes with large chests? No, the media bombards us with images of these women because, as I said, we’re predisposed to find them sexually attractive. Evolutionary psychologists Alan Miller and Satoshi Kanazawa compare this to fast-food advertising. Miller and Kanazawa would say that I don’t consume so many McDonald’s hamburgers, fries and soft drinks because I’m brainwashed by McDonald’s commercials; I consume so many McDonald’s hamburgers, fries and soft drinks because they taste good. McDonald’s commercials just capitalize on my innate preferences.

We’re attracted to women with obviously dyed blond hair and unrealistically large breasts because our genes haven’t had enough time to match our intellect. Breast implants only recently celebrated their 100th anniversary, and men’s genetic preferences, which evolved over tens of thousands of years, need time to catch up.

But maybe they’ll never catch up. We’re still attracted to women in makeup, which has been around for more than 6,000 years. Archaeologists discovered that 4,000 years ago Egyptians used kohl (a face paint of ash, almond, lead and copper) to line their eyes. Women have been using cosmetics to accentuate facial features and simulate smooth, even skin ever since.

Smashbox Cosmetics Specialist Stella Nichols says, “Nine times out of 10, applying makeup is about covering discoloration and blemishes. The best way to downplay blemishes is to start with a green-toned primer, followed by a full coverage foundation, which gives the illusion of practically flawless skin.”

But makeup can do more than that. Nichols, who has painted hundreds of faces, uses makeup to alter the appearance of women’s bone structure.

“I use contouring and highlighting tricks to slim and define her face. I use a small contour brush to apply a matte bronzer that’s slightly darker than the skin tone. I start at the hairline and bring it down directly under the cheekbone. Then I use a blush brush, to apply light powder to the cheekbone, which highlights and raises the cheekbones.

“Next I apply bronzer right under the jawline for sharpness and definition. Takes the attention away from jowls, too.”

Nichols points out that for her, makeup isn’t necessarily about deception: “There’s nothing deceptive about dark purple lipstick. Nobody is born with that kind of pigment in their skin. Makeup allows me to wear my imagination on my face. I look at it like any other art form; I don’t wear it to trick people into thinking I look like someone I don’t. That leads to trouble.”

Women realize that many guys only want them for their looks, and guys like Tony Clink realize that girls realize as much—so they develop strategies to convince the women otherwise. Pickup artists Style and Ross Jeffries give this speech to women they meet in bars and clubs:

“I live in Los Angeles. It’s where the most beautiful women in the country come to try and make it. You look around a club there, and everyone’s good-looking. It makes this VIP room look like a dive bar. And do you know what I’ve learned? Beauty is common. It’s something you’re born with or you pay for. What counts is what you make of yourself. What counts is a great outlook and a great personality.”

After reading 1,700 words on beauty and deception, that line about a great outlook and great personality must sound refreshing. But remember Jeffries’ and Style’s motivation for saying it: They want women to think they’re not concerned with beauty, when they definitely are—they both admit this much.

“I’ve heard that speech so many times,” Oxana told me. “I mean, not those exact words, but pretty close. And you’re telling me all the guys who say that stuff are lying? You’re telling me they were just saying that to get into my pants?”

“Maybe. Depends on the guy.”

“This is all very depressing.”

That doesn’t make it untrue. We fall victim to these deceptions when we deny they exist. Only when we acknowledge and appreciate the lies and the bullshit that go into the courting ritual can we hope to transcend them. And when we transcend the lies and the bullshit, we stand a chance of finding what we’re all after: true love.

Or you could try the Law of Attraction and astrology. Good luck with that.

Rick Lax is the author of Lawyer Boy: A Case Study on Growing Up.

Print This

WHAT'S NOT IN YOUR JEANS-Every day pop-up ads cross our screen that promise us wrinkle-free faces, plumper lips and cellulite-free thighs. We open our mail to find coupons for liposuction, tummy tucks and firmer breasts from doctors that promise us unbelievable results. We flip through magazine ads for clothing that will transform our bodies into more attractive, seductive pieces of flesh. Each time we channel surf we come across infomercials that hypnotize us into believing all the devices for sale will answer all of our prayers in finding a way to be thinner, more attractive, more fertile, according to your article. Deception. Hair, nails, make-up, boobs, bras, panties, and/or even teeth can be classified as objects of deception. However, deception isn't always deceptive if it's used in the proper manner. Enhance, not mask. Enhancement is good, masking is bad.
What's deceptive is a SOCK stuffed into a man's underwear which, when discovered, totally drains any sort of attraction, relative to sex or fertility, right out of us. Sure there's Viagra and Enhance and those tricky little ring/cuff things that promise longer, stronger lasting sensual moments, but, again, very deceptive. Us girls are in the same boat as you guys. What is real? With respect to us girls wanting to find someone honest who doesn't resort to psychological mind games to just get laid, we might as well just give up. We shouldn't waste our time. It's never gonna happen! We who have read your article aren't exactly what you call professionals. Some of us have degrees and some of us don't. However, we all are intuitive and can see through the bull. There are times of the month that we may slip into a more sensitive, more needy mode but we come to our senses and realize that honest men don't really exist. Don't get us wrong, we enjoy men and what's in their "genes", but we know what men are all about"just getting a piece of ass. Cavemen hunted and brought their mate a prize piece of meat (no pun intended) to copulate. Men these days often bribe their women with other sorts of luxuries just to get a little. Dinner, drinks, movies, jewelry"anything that will lead to a big thank you. Dah, we know it. It's a process. As you mentioned, McDonald's commercials just capitalize on your innate preferences. The dinners, drinks and presents are pretty enticing and, actually, somewhat appreciated. Face it, men's intellect will never catch up to our breasts-we searched our memories for a man that has overall genetically matured and we can't come up with even one! We have nothing substantial to verify our findings but our own experiences and, collectively, we have had many experiences. We agree, no matter how we, both male and female, present our exterior, we are who we are. Women and men. We are both deceitful in many respects. Oxama--sorry"yes"all those men say the things they say because they want to get into your pants. Get yourself a neutered dog if you want a loyal mate.

Posted by: Sandy on 1/29/09 at 2:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Not all men want blonde longhaired women with the qualities described. Some refined cultured men want to be with an exotic willowy brunette. Only a certain type of man wants the stereotype you describe - usually less educated macho chauvinistic types who write books talking about women like objects. The smart decent men don't talk about this subject in books - they discuss more worldly topics, but they have the classy women. Good news also - classy women don't care about the size of a man's package. This whole fertility thing is overblown and people buy into it.

Posted by: ValRaven on 1/29/09 at 8:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

While there are many exceptions to these rules, we cannot deny our evolutionary instincts, as an overall group as human beings, for fitness and survival. After all, the only true, undeniable purpose of life itself, on a scientific basis, is to pass on our genes. Our close connection with our primitive ancestors to impulsively reproduce, despite our explosion of intellect, remains all too prevalent. Well done Mr. Lax.

Posted by: carter39 on 1/30/09 at 12:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

hey sandy. thanks for the thoughtful comment. stella, the smashbox specialist, also made the enhancement/masking distinction pretty clear to me...that thing didn't make the final piece, but she mentioned it a few times....lol...but getting my dog neutered was SUCH a big deal to me...took months before i could do it...diagnosed myself with Neutering Anxiety...

And VAL, i see what you're getting at, and agree with some of it, but i don't like your implication that a blonde woman with hair extensions can't be refined or cultured...i know a few who'd be really upset at reading that...and rightfully so. verdict still out on the 'package' issue.

and CARTER...sounds like somebody's been reading their evolutionary psychology textbook ;)

Posted by: Rick Lax (Staff) on 1/30/09 at 1:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't agree with your thesis that certain ideals of beauty are influenced so much by genetics/evolution. Example: survival was an athletic endeavor and women with D+ breasts would have been gravely hindered. Some theories popular in evolutionary psychology are too subjective to be considered real science. I think that what is "attractive" is more influenced by socialogical factors than your article would lead someone to believe, but more than one theory can be reasonably presented.

What is more worth discussion is the anectodal example of your roommate, Oxana, and the issues it raises.

Our culture produces adults who rarely develop emotionally beyond adolescence; this factors greatly into how we approach courtship and what we think is attractive.

From what you write, Oxana gives the impression that she prefers men who are confident, relaxed and sincere; however, she attends nightclubs where she is likely to meet men who, at best, try to fake this. From what I know about the club scene, Oxana is probably able to bypass the lines and is not required to pay a cover charge--a courtesy often extended to Las Vegas' legitimate showgirls.

Why do showgirls catch this break?

Is it because community minded management worries that busy, overworked showgirls might become severely socially stunted without their help?

Is it because having showgirls in regular attendance attracts sensible, sincere men in search of engaging conversation?

No. It is because hot single girls attract men who will fork over lot's of cash to try to impress and hustle them into short term, intimate relationships.

I am not attacking Oxana or trying to embarrass her--she sounds like a solid, smart woman; if it were not for the lines I would spend more time in clubs. Maybe Oxana has already addressed this in her own life, but many have not: when looking for honest, sincere companionship, look elsewhere.

Try volunteering, or at least attending, regional Special Olympics events. (I'd even bet that Oxana is somewhat athletic and her help would be greatly appreciated. Plus, it's fun.) I'm not saying a person should do this merely to cruise for intimate companionship, or that Special Olympics is the only alternative, but finding one's self in a different setting with different company would be personally rewarding and beneficial in many ways.

Maybe you would be interested in writing a much needed book about the subject; one that counters the "how to be a dirtbag" manuals you cited in your article--something that might give more than one theory about what is attractive and why, as well as a guide to where and how to find the types of people we want to believe we'd like to meet. That last part could be done as a compilation of a series of articles.

Contact me if you want to hear more ideas about this. You have an appealing literary voice and I'm sure it would be a successful endeavor for you.

Either way, I like your article.

Posted by: intrepidhero on 2/4/09 at 9:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hi intrepidhero, and that's for the thoughtful response. Yeah, DD would be tough when running away from a beast...but remember, most the hunters were guys, who didn't have DDs to worry about. I agree that I didn't spend enough time in the piece on socialogical factors...but I submit these factors have evolutionary underpinnings too. You're definitely right about why clubs let the pretty girls in...it's purely a business decision, to make money. And I also agree with you that clubs are a tough place to meet people. Sounds like we're not on such different pages...

Posted by: Rick Lax (Staff) on 3/4/09 at 2:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Discussion:

In an effort to increase the dialogue on our stories, we will be requiring Facebook accounts to leave comments on lasvegasweekly.com stories. We believe that Weekly readers are likely to have Facebook accounts already and more apt to comment on this site with that account rather than have to create an account with us. If, however, you do not have a Facebook account, click here to sign up for one. If you have questions, comments or concerns about this new commenting policy, please let us know.

For any other questions related to commenting on Weekly stories, please read our full policy.

Facebook Activity