El Oh El,

Awww, it appears that when someone can't rebut an argument, they decide to delete it instead. That doesn't make you look pathetic and defeated at all! Keep it up Deanna and the Las Vegas Times.

It was really too easy.

"I don't feel it's necessary or productive to cut down other people."

Followed by:

"I'm sure Jesus wasn't smiling to hear you talk like that.....just something to think about."

Definition of hypocrisy: "The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness."

I think it's fitting for you, wouldn't you agree?

"let's start bashing on my opinion too!!"

Oh yes Kalynn, you two are such victims of adversaries of the 1st amendment!

You ask 'who cares'? Well, I believe we are all responding to someone who cared about the show enough to publish an article about it, while simultaneously mocking someone for their religious faith. That's always classy, isn't it?

"I thought Kinsey's party was sutible for a sweet 16 party but not a party for Nick Cannon...."

It is amusing that you do not approve of the party's theme for Nick Cannon. The reason it is amusing is because Nick Cannon did approve of it. It appears he liked the idea more so than Brett's idea, and I believe it was Brett's all out philosophy to deliver what the client wanted.

It's also weird that Nick Cannon could have a wedding party at an amusement park (i.e. a common place for a child's birthday party), but Kinsey's idea is accused by Deanna and yourself of being too adolescent. Hmm. I guess it's a good thing neither of you are party consultants for him.

"...maybe you should check out some of the other articles she wrote?"

If this article was garbage (in my opinion - wink), what would inspire me to want to read others that she has authored?

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)