As We See It
What’s up with What’s On?
The local entertainment mag has a growing list of potential creditors
Thu, Jun 25, 2009 (midnight)
Usually when newspapers or magazines are struggling financially, they look to cut back on costs. They may curtail their freelance budgets. Local entertainment magazine What’s On seems to have another strategy—not paying its freelancers.
There may be as many as 20 writers who haven’t been compensated by the magazine since the spring. “My only concern is that I hope the writers get paid,” says former editor Martin Stein, who was laid off from the magazine at the end of May. (Full disclosure: Stein used to work at Las Vegas Weekly. Fuller disclosure: What’s On competes with the Weekly’s sister publication, LVM.)
Local writer Pj Perez says he’s owed around $250. He says the money isn’t a big deal as much as the fact the magazine is giving people a hard time about getting paid. “It tells me your business practices are questionable.”
Perez wrote one story in April, submitted his invoice and then ... nothing. He says Stein sent an e-mail out to freelancers explaining that there were, says Perez, “changes behind the scenes” at the magazine, but he was still working to get everyone paid.
Forrest Lee, a journalist with the Los Angeles Times, wrote several stories in the spring for the magazine and is owed around $1,100. Both he and Perez have tried to contact the magazine about getting paid but haven’t been able to reach anyone.
Ink-stained scribes going hungry may only be the tip of the iceberg. What’s On is owned by Kellogg Media Group, which is a defendant in several lawsuits filed in District Court in the last year; all essentially allege some sort of nonpayment. Two suits were brought by printers Creel (which prints the Weekly) and Trend Offset Printing Services; they claim KMG owes them a combined $1.5 million. Another lawsuit, filed by City National Bank, alleges KMG owes another $300,000, although KMG, in one of the few documents it has filed in any of the cases against it, denies the allegation.
Creel also alleges that KMG head David Peeler signed a $50,000 promissory note in exchange for a $50,000 loan advance from Creel—and failed to pay back the promissory note.
Tom Davis, an attorney with Howard & Howard, is representing Creel. “Peeler persuaded Creel [that] with this cash infusion he could get over the hump. Obviously we found out there are so many creditors out there it doesn’t appear possible to get over the hump.”
Calls to KMG’s vice president, Andrea Collier, were unreturned. The Weekly reached Peeler on his cell phone, but he declined to comment about the situation with the freelancers and referred comments back to KMG’s PR office.
One writer, who asked not to be identified, notes, “The pathetic thing is they still actually expect freelancers—not me—who haven’t been paid since February or March to continue producing.”
It’s unclear whether any of the writers will take the magazine to small claims court. Lee says it’s probably not worth it to come to Vegas and deal with the headache of a lawsuit. Still, he notes, “I’ve never encountered anything like this, and I’ve been doing this over 20 years.”
Kind of catty for one magazine---particularly a competitor--to be criticizing another, don't you think? Who really cares except for you, the people who didn't get paid and your competition.
Be careful about throwing mud. I suspect that the Weekly has a few skeletons in the closet.....
Well, we were upfront in the piece about being competitors, for one thing. For another, to us, it's more of an economy story---thanks to the recession, these people are apparently being jacked around. If they weren't media workers---if they were dealers being dicked over by a casino---you wouldn't ask "who cares?" You'd accept it as another tale of workers hurt by the economy. Same here. As for our skeletons, they all came out of the closet years ago.
What's-On having difficulty with finances!!!
It was just a matter of time! When you employ someone to look after the financial side of a business, you research the background of the potential employee thoroughly!
Sounds as though What's On, have burnt their fingers. Not surprised!!!!!!
Dave202: Everyone should care. This is no mud-slinging -- the Weekly was very fair in its reporting. It could have been snarky and accusatory like some other local rags, but it wasn't.
This story serves a larger purpose: A cautionary tale to those who are or who have done business with companies such as What's On, and as someone who's been yanked around by numerous Vegas-based publishers at one time or another (though none as egregious as What's On), it happens more often than you'd think.
But in the Weekly's defense, I've never failed to receive a paycheck from them on time in five years of writing for the paper. Same goes for their major competitor, the fine folks at Stephens Media Group. They have skeletons, sure, but they're those glow-in-the-dark kind you buy during Halloween. :)
-
Saturday
2012-02-11
Suncoast
-
Saturday
2012-02-11
Hard Rock
-
Saturday
2012-02-11
Red Rock Casino
- More ›
-
Monday
2012-02-13
The Strip
-
Monday
2012-02-13
Palms
-
Monday
2012-02-13
Sam's Town
- More ›
-
Tuesday
2012-02-14
Hard Rock
-
Tuesday
2012-02-14
$3 drinks with a text at the door
The Strip
-
Tuesday
2012-02-14
The Strip
- More ›
-
Wednesday
2012-02-15
The Strip
-
Wednesday
2012-02-15
Hard Rock
-
Wednesday
2012-02-15
Drink Specials
- More ›
-
Friday
2012-02-17
The Strip
-
Friday
2012-02-17
The Strip
-
Friday
2012-02-17
Las Vegas Hotel
- More ›
Facebook Activity
Most Popular
- Most Read
- E-mailed
- 1. Criss Angel denies allegations of fight with fired employee
- 2. Star Surveillance: Vince Neil turns 51, Criss Angel, Angel Porrino, ‘Stripped’
- 3. Sh*t Las Vegans Say
- 4. Tao Group to open Marquee sister club in Australia
- 5. My brother always liked playing with Barbies ...
- 6. Photos: Parade of 16 Nations downtown kicks off USA Sevens Rugby
Discussion:
In an effort to increase the dialogue on our stories, we will be requiring Facebook accounts to leave comments on lasvegasweekly.com stories. We believe that Weekly readers are likely to have Facebook accounts already and more apt to comment on this site with that account rather than have to create an account with us. If, however, you do not have a Facebook account, click here to sign up for one. If you have questions, comments or concerns about this new commenting policy, please let us know.
For any other questions related to commenting on Weekly stories, please read our full policy.